Blog titles
Crowded Ideas
Please hold the line
"Please call Stella": A diverse look at a single recitation
Douze Points: Social media and Eurovision
Some linear words about non linear writing
Stuck Abroad
Ashtags to Ashtags
The Future of Story Telling or ‘Why I may need to go to PowerPoint rehab’
Feminism vs. Football – The John Terry Story
Eau de Liverpool anyone?
Defining the Noughties
Losing your digits
What Sherlock can teach researchers
I want it all and I want it now!
‘The Lady Doth Protest Too Much’ … The Generation Y Take on Consumer Activism
When online and physical worlds collide
The danger of making assumptions
Is PowerPoint evil?
Does technology destroy the value of relationships?
Art Through Science
Are incremental improvements enough?
iPhone iSoap
Is Google making us more stoopid?
Frosties or Facebook in the morning?
Social proof and where to stand in an elevator Part 2
Hans Rosling and HIV – clutter AND clarity
Social proof and where to stand in an elevator
The sweet smell of gamers
The best statistical graphic ever drawn?
21 September 2009
In the 1990’s the Russian conceptual artists Vitaly Komar and Alex Melamid attempted to develop perfectly ‘user-centred’ art by using data from quantitative surveys conducted in 14 countries to identify what elements constitute the perfect painting. With the help of the Nation Institute and a research business they used standard preference questions to create each country’s ‘most wanted’ and most unwanted’ paintings. They combined responses to questions such as ‘what is your favourite colour?’ and ‘Do you prefer geometric or random uneven patterns?’ to produce results that theoretically would be the epitome of what people wanted in art.
Here are some of the results

So there you have it. If you want to be a successful artist, be sure to include blue skies in all your paintings and you won’t go far wrong.
After all, the research said it so it must be true.